The South African government's response to the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) crisis has been criticized as slow and inadequate due to a combination of systemic, bureaucratic, and resource-related issues. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons based on recent analyses, government reports, and stakeholder critiques as of February 2026:
The Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development (DALRRD) has been accused of excessive centralization, which hinders rapid decision-making and local action. Laws restrict private vaccine procurement and administration, making it a "state-controlled disease" where only government can intervene—leading to delays in approvals and rollout. For instance, outbreaks detected in KwaZulu-Natal in November 2024 were only declared controlled zones in March 2025, allowing widespread spread. Litigation threats (e.g., from farmer groups like Saai and Sakeliga) could further divert resources, slowing procurement while cases escalate.
Decades of underfunding have resulted in severe shortages: limited state veterinarians, inadequate labs, and weak surveillance systems. Diagnostic turnaround times are slow (up to weeks), hampering early detection and containment. Enforcement of movement controls and biosecurity is poor, with illegal animal movements common due to porous borders and insufficient roadblocks/personnel. Historical mismanagement, like the disappearance of R500 million allocated in 2012 for vet lab upgrades, has left infrastructure outdated.
WEEKEND-VIEWPOINT- The high Gold price and the The World Economic Forum's (WEF) latest Global Risks ReportSouth Africa halted local FMD vaccine production over 20 years ago due to underfunding and regulatory issues, relying on imports from Botswana, Argentina, Turkey, and others—which face delays in procurement and delivery. The recent restart at ARC Onderstepoort (first doses in February 2026, 20,000/week scaling to 200,000/week by 2027) is seen as too late; the vaccine was developed in 2010 and registered in 2022 but not scaled. With 291 cases in Free State alone and national needs at ~14 million doses every six months for control, current supply (2 million administered so far) falls short, prolonging the crisis.
Impractical legislation (e.g., Animal Diseases Act) criminalizes non-reporting but lacks enforcement capacity, while blocking private initiatives. Farmers argue for allowing private imports/administration, but government fears masking infections or undermining FMD-free status goals. A 10-year eradication plan aims for 80% vaccination in affected herds within 12 months and 70% incidence reduction, but critics say it's fragmented and slow, with poor inter-departmental coordination.
Limited budgets divert funds to legal defenses rather than frontline efforts like vaccines or recruitment. The outbreak's scale (8/9 provinces affected, worst since 2019) overwhelms capacity, with economic impacts (R2.6 billion export losses projected by end-2026, up to R13 billion broader effects) adding pressure but not speeding response.
Minister John Steenhuisen's handling has drawn criticism for downplaying grievances and attacking farmer organizations on social media, while stakeholders accuse the "agricultural deep state" (mega-farmers, agribusinesses) of influencing policy to favor consolidation over small/family farmers. Historical neglect under previous administrations compounded issues, but current GNU delays in declaring a national disaster hinder faster resource mobilization.
Overall, the slow response stems from chronic underinvestment, bureaucratic inertia, over-centralization, and regulatory rigidity—exacerbating a crisis that's not just agricultural but threatens food security, exports (beef volumes down sharply), prices (beef up 31% y/y), and rural livelihoods. Calls for reform include privatizing vaccine access, boosting vet services, and farmer-led initiatives. For more details, recent reports from DALRRD, AgriSA, Saai, and FAO highlight the need for urgent, decentralized action to regain FMD-free status.
The frustration among South African commercial farmers regarding the government's handling of the foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak is widespread and well-documented, with many echoing your sentiment that producers—who supply the bulk of the nation's food—cannot afford to wait for slow official assistance. Given the Department of Agriculture's dismal track record of kicking out, isolating, and attacking people who ask critical questions, we are concerned about veterinarians and agricultural leaders on the minister's committees who insist that is ignoring their recommendations.
Trusting your gut might point to suspicions of foul play (e.g., deliberate delays for land grabs or incompetence masking corruption), but evidence leans toward systemic decay: underfunding, outdated laws, and governance failures since pre-2024 outbreaks.
Standing together and solving the problem very fast- is what south African farmers can do- but the government want to be in control.
Want to join our popular weekly viewpoint? Contact us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.! You can make your own Viewpoint. - Our Professional civilized approach to your option is respected.
Every week, our flagship Viewpoint article is now shared with 33 international media houses across continents. These partners translate and publish the content in 12 international languages, putting South Africa's farming stories, challenges and triumphs in front of thousands of readers worldwide.
DISCLAIMER
The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by CRA and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
